What “enough” actually means

The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) publishes the benchmark most Australians have heard. As at late 2025, ASFA estimates a homeowner couple needs around $76,505 a year for a comfortable retirement, and a single needs around $54,240 a year. The lump sums they suggest at retirement are roughly $690,000 for a couple and $595,000 for a single.

Those numbers do something useful — they give you a rough orientation. But here’s what they don’t tell you. They assume you own your home, that you retire at 67, and that you live to about 85. And they assume a “comfortable” lifestyle as ASFA defines it — a domestic holiday once a year, top-level private health cover, a reasonable car.

Want overseas holidays? Your number is higher. Planning to rent in retirement? It climbs much higher. Retiring at 60 lifts it again — and helping your adult children with house deposits pushes it higher still.

But here’s the part that surprises most people: if your lifestyle expectations are modest, if you own your home, if you’re willing to draw a part Age Pension, your number is often much lower than the headlines suggest. I’ve sat with couples who walked in convinced they needed $1.2 million, and walked out understanding they were already on track for the life they actually wanted with $550,000.

The Age Pension is doing more work than you think

This is the single most common misunderstanding I see. Australians of your generation often assume they won’t qualify for the Age Pension, or that qualifying for “only” a part-pension means it’s not worth thinking about. Both assumptions cost people years of unnecessary worry.

Here’s the reality. As at the September 2025 indexation, the full Age Pension pays around $31,223 a year for a single and $47,070 a year for a couple combined — these figures include the pension supplement and energy supplement, and they’re indexed again every March and September. A homeowner couple can have hundreds of thousands of dollars in super and investments outside their home and still receive a meaningful part-pension — the upper asset threshold for a couple to receive any pension is currently around $1.05 million in assessable assets.

For most retirees we work with, the Age Pension ends up funding 30 to 50 per cent of their retirement income. That changes the conversation completely. If your lifestyle costs $75,000 a year and the Age Pension is contributing $25,000 of that, your super only needs to fund the remaining $50,000. The mountain you thought you were climbing turns out to be a hill.

This isn’t a loophole or a workaround. The Australian retirement system was designed for super and the Age Pension to work together — it’s a three-pillar system on purpose. Treating super as if it has to do the whole job alone is how people end up working five years longer than they needed to.

Your home is part of your retirement, even if you never sell it

Your family home is your single most powerful retirement asset, and not just because of what it’s worth. It does three things at once.

First, it’s exempt from the Age Pension assets test. Whether your home is worth $400,000 or $1.4 million, it doesn’t count against your pension. This is why so many “asset-rich, cash-poor” Australians qualify for more pension than they expect.

Second, it removes rent from your budget. The single biggest difference between a comfortable retirement and a stressful one in Australia today is whether you own your home outright by the time you stop working. A homeowner couple needing $75,000 a year and a renter couple needing $75,000 a year are in completely different financial universes.

Third, it’s an option in reserve. Downsizing later in retirement can release tax-effective contributions back into super — the downsizer contribution allows eligible Australians 55 and over to contribute up to $300,000 each from the sale of their home. Reverse mortgages and the government’s Home Equity Access Scheme are options if you ever need them. You don’t have to use these. You just have them.

Most pre-retirees I meet underestimate their home’s contribution to their retirement security. Once they see it properly, the picture shifts.

What retirement actually costs (and how it changes)

Here’s something nobody tells you in your fifties: retirement doesn’t have one cost. It has at least three phases, and they cost different amounts.

This matters because retirement planning that assumes a flat $75,000 a year for 30 years gives you the wrong picture. A good retirement plan front-loads the lifestyle spending, allows for the quieter middle, and reserves capacity for the later years. When clients understand this, the question changes from “do I have enough for thirty years?” to “do I have enough for the next ten, with a sensible plan for what comes after?” That’s a question with a far less scary answer.

The thing nobody warns you about: one of you will outlive the other

This is the conversation I have to introduce gently with couples, because most haven’t talked about it. Statistically, one partner will live several years longer than the other. Often more than five. Sometimes more than ten.

What this means for your planning is significant. The surviving partner moves from the couple Age Pension rate to the single rate, and the combined household pension drops by roughly a third. Many household costs don’t fall to match — the rates bill, the insurance, the standing charges on utilities all stay roughly the same for one person as for two. Some costs rise, because tasks the other partner used to do (driving, repairs, gardening) now need to be paid for.

A retirement plan that’s just adequate for both of you can become genuinely difficult for the survivor. Planning for this isn’t morbid — it’s one of the most loving things you can do for the person you’ll leave behind, or the person who will be left with you. It often shifts how we structure contributions, how we set up super between two people, how we think about insurance, and how we approach estate planning.

What “running out” actually looks like

The fear most pre-retirees carry — sometimes consciously, often not — is the fear of running out of money. It sits underneath everything: the avoidance, the late-night worry, the reluctance to spend on things you’d enjoy.

Here’s what I want you to understand. For homeowner Australians with even modest super and partial Age Pension, “running out” almost never looks like reaching zero. It looks like a gradual narrowing of choices. The annual overseas trip becomes a domestic one. Dinners out become less frequent. The car gets kept an extra five years.

The Age Pension is the floor. It is, by design, a safety net that doesn’t disappear. As your super draws down and your assessable assets decrease, your Age Pension entitlement actually increases — the system is built to step in more as your private savings reduce. A retiree who started with $400,000 in super and a part-pension will often, in their late 80s, be on a near-full pension. Their lifestyle changes, but the floor holds.

This doesn’t mean you should be careless about your super. It means the catastrophic outcome you may be quietly afraid of is much rarer in Australia than the worry suggests. Understanding that doesn’t eliminate the need to plan — it makes the planning calmer.

The decisions that matter most in your last decade of work

If you’re 50 to 60 and reading this, the decisions you make in the next ten years will shape your retirement more than anything that happens after you stop working. Here are the ones that matter most.

Contributing extra while you still earn

The Superannuation Guarantee is now 12% (since 1 July 2025). Salary sacrifice up to the $30,000 concessional cap, or use the carry-forward rule if your balance was under $500,000 at the previous 30 June, and you can recover years of unused cap. Every dollar contributed in your fifties has fifteen-plus years to compound.

Reviewing your investment option

Many Australians sit in the MySuper default their whole working life. That option might not match where you are now. A 55-year-old has a different risk profile and time horizon than a 35-year-old, and a different one again from a 65-year-old. This is worth a conversation.

Consolidating thoughtfully

Multiple super accounts mean duplicate fees and sometimes duplicate insurance. Consolidating can save tens of thousands over a decade. But check the insurance in each account before closing anything — losing valuable cover by accident is one of the most painful mistakes I see.

Deciding when to actually stop

The difference between retiring at 60 and retiring at 65 is enormous, and not just because of the extra contributions. Those five extra years are five years your super doesn’t have to fund, plus five more years of compounding. Sometimes the best retirement plan is “work two more years than you wanted to.” Sometimes it’s “you can stop now, you just didn’t realise it.”

Talking to your partner properly about all of this

I cannot count the number of couples I meet where one partner has been silently worrying for years and the other had no idea. The conversation alone — facilitated by a third party who handles the numbers — often relieves more weight than any strategy we put in place.

When to get help

You can navigate most of this yourself if your situation is simple. One income, one super account, modest assets outside super, comfortable with the default investment option, happy to retire at preservation age — you’ll get most of the way there with a bit of research and an evening with a calculator. For an independent, government-backed tool to model your own situation, use Moneysmart’s Retirement Planner — Moneysmart is the Australian Securities and Investments Commission’s (ASIC) consumer financial guidance service.

The reason to get help is rarely that the numbers are complicated. It’s that you’ve been carrying the worry alone for too long, and the worry is starting to affect things it shouldn’t — your sleep, your relationship, your willingness to enjoy the life you’ve worked for.

When a client sits down with us at Bundoora and we work through their actual situation — not the headlines, not the averages, their situation — what they’re really paying for isn’t a financial plan. They’re paying to put the weight down. To hand it to someone qualified, who’s done this a thousand times, who can tell them with confidence where they stand. That’s the heart of our superannuation and retirement planning in Melbourne service.

Sometimes the answer is “you’re fine, here’s the small change you should make, see us in two years.” Sometimes it’s a meaningful course correction. But it’s always — always — better than the years of not knowing.

Frequently Asked Questions